Tarzan Shame Of Jane 1995 !full! — Genuine & Newest

One of the most discussed aspects of this production is its surprisingly high technical quality compared to other adult features of the 1990s.

👉 Have you seen The Shame of Jane ? Or did your parents wisely hide the remote in 1995?

The producers, a fly-by-night outfit named , had already dissolved by the time the lawsuit landed. But subsequent distributors were spooked. The existing VHS masters were ordered destroyed in 1998. However, a few copies survived, traded among collectors for hundreds of dollars. As of 2025, a sealed original VHS of "Tarzan: Shame of Jane" sold on eBay for $1,400. tarzan shame of jane 1995

We open not in the jungle, but in 1995 London. Jane Porter (played by B-movie regular , using the pseudonym “Eve Darling”) is a burned-out anthropologist. She inherits her late father’s journal, which contains coordinates to an uncharted African valley. Skeptical but intrigued, she joins a shady expedition led by a villainous poacher named Victor Ravencroft (a scenery-chewing character actor named Hugh G. Rektion ).

In the years since its release, "The Shame of Jane" (1995) has developed a cult following among fans of the Tarzan franchise. While it may not be as well-known or widely regarded as other Tarzan films, it remains an interesting footnote in the history of the character. One of the most discussed aspects of this

have noted it for having higher production values than its peers, specifically highlighting its use of 35mm film and genuine African locations. of Joe D'Amato films or perhaps mainstream Tarzan adaptations from the 1990s? Tarzan - Shame of Jane (1995) - IMDb

On the surface, it sounds like a cheap cash-in on a public domain character. And strictly speaking, it is. But looking back at it through the lens of 2024, it stands as a fascinating time capsule of 90s erotica, practical effects, and a level of camp that has to be seen to be believed. The producers, a fly-by-night outfit named , had

Feminist critics have argued that Jane's character represents a missed opportunity for a strong, empowered female lead. Her portrayal reinforces traditional feminine norms, where women are defined by their relationships with men and their physical appearance. However, Jane's character can also be seen as a product of its time, reflecting the societal attitudes and expectations of the 1990s.