|
Register | Login | Help | Feedback | SiteMap | Add to favorites | Currency: |
| |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
By following these recommendations, you can ensure that you're using a reliable and accurate software tool that meets your needs while minimizing the risks associated with pirated software.
: Engineers spend less time debugging "lost ray" errors and more time optimizing the actual optical performance of the system. Comparison: Crack-Free vs. Tessellated Models Crack-Free (NURBS-based) Tessellated (Mesh-based) Surface Smoothness Mathematically perfect curves Approximated by flat facets Ray Interaction High precision at any zoom level Accuracy depends on mesh density Model Size Generally smaller file sizes Very large for high-precision meshes Risk of Gaps Eliminated by design High, especially at complex junctions lighttools crack free
: In complex light-guiding structures (like automotive dashboard indicators), crack-free modeling ensures total internal reflection (TIR) is calculated correctly across every surface transition. Seamless CAD Integration By following these recommendations, you can ensure that
: Models can be moved between LightTools and mechanical CAD software (like SolidWorks or CATIA) without the need for manual "healing" of broken surfaces. Reduced Computation Waste By following these recommendations
| ||||||||||||||||||
Links: |